Media reports of January 2016 stated the govt had spent about Rs 5000 crores to wash River Yamuna over the past 22 years but its waters still stank.

The Central Pollution control panel informed the Supreme Court that maximum pollution is gathered in 22 km because the river runs through Delhi. On December 20, 2018, Lok Sabha was informed that Rs 1514.70 crores under the Yamuna Action Plan was already spent and government has sanctioned 17 projects under ‘Namami Ganga’ costing Rs 3941.73 crores – Rs 2361.08 crores to Delhi, Rs 1347.5 crores to Uttar Pradesh , Rs 217.87 crores to Haryana and Rs 15.97 crores to Himachal Pradesh.

However, industrial and other waste continues to pour into rivers, only to be flushed during monsoons when rivers are overflowing. The Swachh Bharat mission makes only ‘some’ difference due to poor administration, corruption, no fear of punishment and resultant lack of individual discipline unseen in Indians abroad.

Why should landfills smolder when pollution is already choking citizens? India ranked 80 within the global Corruption Perception 2020 slipping two ranks below the previous year, regardless of the media blitz that corruption has been exhausted . Just ask the commoner (not doctored surveys) to understand the truth of corruption and bribery within the country.

Recent media reports of November 4, 2020 mentioned that the Supreme Court’s idea of fixing enough number of special courts for quick trial of sitting and former MPs and MLAs facing criminal charges has gathered momentum with the endorsement of as many as 23 high courts, although Madras HC has reversed its 2018 backing for the SC directive.

In 2018, the govt had informed the SC that 1,765 MPs and MLAs were then facing criminal trials in 3,045 cases. This number was 36 percent of all parliamentarians and state assembly members, their overall numbers being 4,896. the very best number of criminal cases against lawmakers was in Uttar Pradesh (248 MPs and MLAs) followed by Tamil Nadu (178), Bihar (144), West Bengal (139), Andhra Pradesh and Kerala, albeit such details from Maharashtra and Goa were still awaited.

The government provided the above data on directions from the Supreme Court on the idea of a petition against lawmakers by Ashwini Kumar Upadhay contending that actual number of such cases were quite 13,500 plus allegations by the NGOs Association for Democratic Reforms that 1,581 cases were pending against lawmakers after the 2014 general elections.

Simultaneously, the Centre announced fixing 12 special courts to exclusively affect cases against 1,581 tainted lawmakers “within one year”, including two special courts to handle cases against 228 MPs.

The fact that this translated to 1125 cases to be decided by each special court in 12 months (each special court disposing off 4.6 average number of cases daily since trial courts generally function for 242 days in one year) indicated either no due thought had been given to the difficulty or it had been just a yarn like the story of getting all the black a refund from Swiss banks.

With 2020 coming to an end, we are still deciding about fixing special courts. In what percentage decades can we expect these 3,045 cases to be resolved knowing the pace of our judicial process?

At best some ‘action’ could also be visible closer to the 2024 general elections with the attendant fanfare for obvious reasons – some odd punishments while the goons still enjoy the fruits of polity. deem example the so-called detention of a former chief minister during a bungalow with access to everything as hithertofore.

The SC has noted an alarming increase within the number of candidates with criminal records entering politics; 24 percent MPs had criminal cases pending against them in 2004, which went up to 30 percent in 2009 and 34 percent in 2014, but in 2019 43 percent MPs had criminal cases pending against them. Recall that on May 25, 2019, the media revealed that of 539 winners in Lok Sabha 2019, 233 MPs had declared criminal cases against themselves – a rise of 44 percent during this category since 2009.

The perpetual Catch 22 is that nothing has been ‘proved’ against them and therefore the SC has said that barring them is forte of the legislature, not of the judiciary. little question false cases are often filed by opposition parties or on their behest. The panacea for this is often speedy trial and giving exemplary punishment where a false allegation is proved but are we geared for this?

The irony is that such cases may drag on for many years and guilty even going scot free counting on which party is ruling at the Centre or within the concerned state.

Marcus Cicero within the Roman Empire of yore wrote in 43 BC: the poor work and work, the rich exploit the poor, the soldier protects both, the taxpayer pays for all three, the banker robs all four, the lawyer misleads all five, the doctor bills all six, the goons scare all seven, the politician lives happily on account of all eight.

We may decide what proportion of this is often relevant in India of today considering that an outsized percentage of our legislators are goons and political parties prefer candidates with criminal records due to their illegal riches and goon armies, giving them tickets to contest elections banking on their ‘rogue winnability’ factor.

Not very far back the media brought out that a former chief minister had given a false affidavit when filing his nomination to contest elections. But no follow up happened and he are going to be propped up as chief minister candidate in future also.

The question is where one third of the top of India’s body (the lawmakers) are rotting, what Swachh Bharat can we keep talking about and what can the general public expect?

India ranked 94 among 107 nations within the Global Hunger Index 2020 even below Bangladesh (ranked 75), Myanmar (78), and Pakistan (88)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here